WOKE. An Anesthesiologist’s View is a rigorous and entertaining critique of how we think about our world. In this book I seek to offer a solution to navigating an increasingly divergent set of narratives coming from our media sources. Rather than adding to the noise I instead suggest that we have forgotten or ignored a fundamental ability we each possess to discern fact from fiction. This ability can be considered our intuition. The confusion we find ourselves in today is due to the fact that we are too quick to believe someone else’s narrative before ridding ourselves of our impediments to clarity. These impediments are our biases. As long as we continue to interpret our world through bias we will never access our innate wisdom: intuition. Here I am not asserting that intuition will lead us unequivocally to “the truth”. Instead it more often leads us to a much more dynamic perspective, one of uncertainty, an aspect of reality we have become uncomfortable in embracing.

Once we realize that our understanding of the world and how it works is based on some degree of uncertainty, we can then take an honest look at very big ideas that we subscribe to individually and collectively. History has shown us again and again that when we are inflexible in our opinions and understanding we are thrown into periods of stagnation that can last for a very long time. Could we be in a “Dark Age” right now? How “certain” can we be that we aren’t? Have we been misconceiving reality because we have grown comfortable letting other people tell us where to place our attention?

Links to References in the Book

If you own a copy of “Woke. An Anesthesiologist’s View” I am grateful for your support and admire your curiosity. There are 37 pieces of referenced material in the first edition which appear as hyperlinks in the ebook. This material is vitally important to consider as you decide whether to dismiss or accept the ideas I present. If you are reading the paperback I have included the links here for your convenience:

Chapter 4

[1] (National Science Foundation poll)


Chapter 5

[2] (Scientific American on Dr. Stevenson)

[3] (Washington Post on Dr. Stevenson)

Chapter 6

[4] (German government’s warning to the American People in Des Moines Register)

Chapter 7

[5] (Governor George Pataki on CNN: Where did the buildings go?)

[6] (Slow motion collapse of North Tower)

[7] (Map of human remains surrounding Ground Zero from FDNY via Village Voice)

[8] (NY Times: Challenge of Medical Examiners after 9/11)

[9] (CNN: Fires at ground zero extinguished three months later)

[10] (Footage of Building 7 Collapse)

[11] (University of Alaska study proving Building 7 destruction was NOT due to fires)

[12] (CSPAN : Sec. State Rumsfeld and Joint Chief of Staff Chair confirm NORAD exercises on morning of 9/11)

[13] (Third Party analysis of the collapse sequence of twin towers from Journal of Engineering Mechanics formulated two days after 9/11)

[14] (Official NIST document referencing weight of top section of North Tower—see table on page 176

[15] (Slow motion collapse of North Tower—there is no top section of North Tower)

[16] (Molten metal spewing from South Tower after plane collision)

[17] (FDNY Captain describes molten steel flowing in the basement of twin tower)

[18] (Summary of testimony from 118 Firefighters confirming explosive events prior to the collapse of the twin towers)


[19] (Multiple mainstream media reports of explosions in twin towers)

[20] (Organization of Firefighters calling for reinvestigation of 9/11

[21] (Super slow motion clip of the beginning of North Tower collapse:antenna moves first)

[22] (Cover of Elevator World magazine confirming massive elevator renovation in twin towers prior to 9/11)

[23] (Previously classified documents regarding project Northwoods from 1962. Page 10 of Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A describes a proposed scenario similar to 9/11)

[24] (Organization of professional pilots requesting reinvestigation of 9/11)

[25] (Transcript of President G.W. Bush address to the U.N. in 11/2001 invoking the term “Conspiracy Theory” seven years before the conclusion of the official investigation)

[26] (Organization of professional Architects and Engineers calling for reinvestigation of 9/11)

[27] (Webinars designed by Architects to inform other professionals about the deficiencies in the official investigation)
[28] (BBC original broadcast announcing the destruction of Building 7 20 minutes before the event)

[29] (CNN coverage from the ground moments before the destruction of Building 7. Police stating the building is about to blow up)

Chapter 8

[30] (CBS reports US Navy pilots confirm UFOs over East Coast)

[31] (CNN reports US Navy acknowledges UFO footage)


[32] (Dr. Greer, FAA and ex military officials announce that UFOs are real at National Press Club in 2001)

[33] (Sirius Disclosure Website)

[34] (Trinity, first detonation of a nuclear device on Earth)

[35] (Joe Rogan interviews Bob Lazar)

[36] (Invention Secrecy Act)

[37] (Patent Security Category Review List from 1971)

I regularly publish articles on the Substack platform. My newsletter is called “An Insult to Intuition”. I offer my thoughts on politics, science, humor, consciousness and the deception in legacy media and institutionalized science. I take on topics that are deeply polarizing and controversial. However my intent in this endeavor is to foster meaningful exchanges. Readers are not required to pay to subscribe or to leave comments. I welcome those who disagree with my opinions and conclusions to let me know where I have gotten it wrong…

Here are links to some of my most popular essays:

Infiltrating a Vaccine Industry symposium and confronting their leaders: “From the Belly of the Beast

Coming out to my M.I.T. Classmates as a “Conspiracy Theorist”: “I come out to my MIT classmates as a Conspiracy Theorist

The simplest argument for why the 9/11 narrative is demonstrably incorrect: “Got Thirty Seconds? This video explains Everything

Parallels between September 11th and October 7th: “Israel’s 9/11

The enormous amount of uncertainty around CO2 driven warming: “The Dubious Origins of the CO2 Driven Global Warming Hypothesis